data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a5aa/6a5aa5beb85e1405f55b7e44728d5e7771942836" alt=""
Source: Ashrafiya.com
What do they mean by 'desire'?
If people understood the one fundamental principle about the human experience, then most of their problems would cease to exist. That is, the human experience is a subjective one. We are always going to be ruled by biases, it is up to us whether to accept the ones we mistakenly inherit as children or to consciously decide on our own as an attempt to guide our own lives in a direction of our choosing.
See all those updates on my blog where I quoted the Roman Stoics or newer Western philosophers like Descartes. Anything which pleases or displeases someone, including desires, is simply a judgement passed by the mind. One that is alterable. This is unanimous insight into our nature by all human civilizations. Some emphasize it, some do not.
It isn't simply a problem of indulging in desires, because even Islam allows for the fulfillment of basic desires. Or rather, needs. Islam recognizes needs. What turns a need into a desire? The specific expression of it. You need food and other people. The objective truth of the matter is any food or any people would do (or rather, what Allah says would do which is a little more specific). The subjective nature of our experience, however, leads people to conclude one kind or type of something is preferable to the other. This is due to desires being learned from constant exposure and/or socialization/indoctrination. So while we all know to what extent our desires should be controlled, our needs fulfilled, we tend to assume that our current state at any given moment actually means anything.
I need food. I like apples. I value apples over other food and tend to assume that this means something, that apples are therefore significant in some way and my desire for them a meaningful expression of my deeper soul or something. When the truth is, I learned that like for apples from a younger age. We're always learning, adapting, etc in this world, and it's impossible to know what's going on at a younger age when we start learning so much. Say apples in this case are forbidden by Allah for whatever direct or indirect harm they may cause. I know that to curb this desire, I can indoctrinate myself with a new preference. One that I choose. But I'm loathe to do so because... I think apples mean something, not realizing that this "feeling" of something deeper for the apples is merely another layer of manifestation of the desire to begin with. Desires permeate the highest levels of our consciousness and thought processes. They were imprinted into our subconscious minds from first (and repeated) exposure, and now the subconscious guides the conscious. It becomes difficult for me to realize that the only reason I like apples at all is because I had already gone through a period of adaption, socialization, indoctrination, orientation, whatever you want to call it. One that I had no choice or control over due to my young age. It is no more meaningful than anything else I might choose to re-indoctrinate myself with (probably less so, because I make a conscious choice in the latter).
If, as in this case, apples are bad, then I've formed "meaningful" attachments to bad things, and I'm well on my way to disaster because now my very soul is inclined to haraam. And all for what? Something that is seemingly random to the casual observer, completely without meaning or significance. The only significance to the lot that you're dealt in life, is that you have to deal with it. Not the 'lot' in and of itself. It's a means to an end. Everyone is given a 'lot' and everyone has to transcend it to become their own person, not a product of their times. The means is to reprogram yourself according to your own will and conscious choice, otherwise we would simply be products of whatever random occurrences combined to form our childhood, with no correlation to what is good or preferred by Allah. And this is the state of most of humanity today.
This thing, this "preference beyond the need" is a desire. And it is this which, if not ruled over by intelligence, turns men into animals. And if controlled by our intelligence (meaning, oriented in the proper direction for Allah), elevates us above angels.
We never respect desires. We only respect people and their souls/Selves, even if that includes an inability to reckon with their desires. Thus only a few things are made unlawful in Islam. If people want to waste time preferring one kind of food over another that is harder to obtain, so long as it does not take away from religious responsibilities and both are lawful, then it's okay. What's okay? Not the preference. But the inability by the person to control their Nafs, their weakness. Better to give some leeway rather than have people self-destruct under the burden. There are more important things to do than worry about food, such as ibadat and tasawwuf. The latter provides a means for circumventing the Nafs and defeating it if a direct attempt at resistance is impossible.
That last anecdote was intended by Imam al-Ghazali (ra) for the prevailing sentiments of the audience of his time, in which marriage was used as a means to greater wealth and status. It is still used predominantly for that in much of the world, but that might be alien to those of us who've lived in the West. It is still used as a means to a worldly end, but the desire is not solely for wealth or status for the majority of people but for aesthetics and (over)indulgence in lust (keeping in mind that Islamic society was very open with regards to sexuality compared to Western society in Imam al-Ghazali's (ra) time so lust does not mean sex... it means specifically the sexual instinct separated from the rest of the thought processes and emotions which should govern it, so it functions like it does in animals initially then eventually strays even from that and descends into the demonic).
"The reality of remembrance [of Allah] cannot be realized in the heart except after inhabiting it with taqwa and purifying it from reproachable traits. If not, this remembrance will merely be [like a person] speaking to himself. This has no power over the heart nor can it repulse Satan. ... Just as your supplications are not answered because the prerequisites of supplication are not present, in like manner you remember Allah and Satan does not flee from you because the prerequisites of remembrance are not present."
-Imam al-Ghazali (ra)
"If the soul is not stopped from some of the lawful things, it will desire the unlawful things."
-Imam al-Ghazali (ra)
"Shirk is of 6 types.(Sharh al-Muqaddamat Pg. 33 and 40)
-Shirk al-Istiqlal- Affirming two separate "gods" like the shirk of the Majus
-Shirk Tab'idh- To believe in a god who is made up of multiple gods, like the shirk of the Christians
-Shirk Taqrib- Worshiping other than Allah, so that they could take one closer to Allah, like the shirk of the early part of the Jahiliyyah era.
-Shirk Taqlid- Worshiping other than Allah, in emulation of someone else, like those of the later Jahiliyyah era
-Shirk al-Asbab- Attribution effect to the apparent means, like the shirk of the Philosophers etc
-Shirk al-Aghradh- Performing actions for other than Allah
The First four are Shirk by consensus, while the sixth is disobedience and there is detail concerning the fifth..."
Idolatry [shirk], like disbelief [kufr], is a covering up of the obvious truth.
There is "major idolatry," which expels a man from his faith, and "minor idolatry" (instances of which include ostentation and some sins), which does not.
It is therefore appropriate to quote what one of correct doctrine says about idolatry. Its kinds - may God protect us! - are six:1. Autonomous idolatry [shirk istiqlal]. This is to affirm the existence of two autonomous dieties, as is the case with the Zoroastrians.
2. Separative idolatry [shirk tab'id]. An instance of this is the Christians who say that God is one of three, the other two being Jesus and his mother. {79}
3. Approximative idolatry [shirk taqrib]. This is to worship other that God with the purpose of drawing nearer to Him through them. Such was the belief of the early Arabs who worshipped stones, saying, "We only worship them so that they may bring us closer to God" (QURAN, 39;3)
4. Imitative idolatry [shirk taqlid]. This involves worshiping other than God in imitation of others. This also was the form of idolatry present in the pre-islamic era of ignorance. They say, "We found our fathers following a religion, and by their footsteps shall we be led" (QURAN, 43;22)
5. Idolatry of secondary causes [shirk al-asbab]. {80} An instance of this is the idolatry of the philosophers and those who believe in nature, and those who follow them.
6. Idolatry of intention [shikr al-aghrad] {81}. This is to carry our acts for other than God.
The unanimous ruling regarding the first four is that they are forms of disbelief.
The sixth is a sin but does not constitute disbelief.
As for the fifth, a distinction has to be made between, first, those who say that secondary causes [in themselves] produce effects by virtue of their intrinsic properties [as, for example, fire leading to burning, water to irrigating, and food to satiety]: such people are disbelievers; second, those who believe that they are effective through a power that God the Exalted has put in them: they are guilty of innovation [bid'a].